>Cetin,
>
>[With a show(1) you wouldn't need read/clear events. Hide() the form to continue on the line that follows read events. You'd get the value and release the for there.]
>
>That works. Thanks.
>
>
>[PS: I didn't understand why "but if the dialog required more complexity, a class would be better" other than preference.]
>
>In this class, I've got only one "parameter" (property). Other dialogs could have several properties which could be mutually exclusive. Rather than have to pass in parameters in a specific order, I'd rather set properties in which ever order I choose. Basic OOP design philosophy.
>
>Regards,
>Thom C.

What if you still pass a single array or object. I don't really see something related/breaking with basic OOP design philosophy here.
Regards
Cetin