Hi David,
i link here because here you explicit your thought.
-------
Not smoking anything my friend... those rules were drilled into my psyche during the 6 years I spend at the University of Missouri-Rolla studying nuclear engineering and computer science. It's a pretty fundamental rule about significant digits in calculations. 3.1 is not the same as 3.1000. Every number written has an implicit error of ± 1/2 the last significant digit. So 3.1 * 2.5567 is 7.9 ± 0.05. 3.1000 * 2.5567 is 7.9258 ± 0.00005. You need to forget the way your grade school teacher taught you to do arithmetic. *g*
1. point
>Every number written has an implicit error of ± 1/2 the last significant digit.
Then you cannot write a exact number ( 1 is 1 ± 0.5, 1.0 is 1.0 ± 0.05 .... )
because you must write infinite decimal digits.
But exist conventions !
If I say that 3.1 are exactly 3.1 then it is like writing 3.100000000000000000....
3.1 is exactly 3.1000000000000000000000000000000000......
7.9258 is exactly 7.92580000000000000000000000.......
2. point
For 3.1 * 2.5567, if 3.1 is 3.1 ± 0.05, also 2.5567 is 2.5567 ± 0.00005,
and the result is 7.92577 ± 0.1279925.
You use measure * factor ( the reason is a mystery )
But however, on this case :
(3.1 ± 0.05) * 2.5567 is 7.92577 ± 0.127835.
You are merging the
theory of the measure with the theory of the calculation,
but with a personal arbitrary arithmetic.
Here, we are alone dealing the theory of the calculation,
we are not measuring any physical event.
Here we have only two factors.
Fabio
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement