OK Marcel,IC.
I certainly understand your frustration, and have run into this often enough myself <s>. (For the same reason as you, usually, SELECT en route to another data format <s>.)
But I'm kinda glad that the cursoradapter class isn't a "magic bullet" for it.
For one thing, it might mean that cursoradapter wasn't using "real" VFP SELECT-SQL under the covers. That would be bad, because it would mean that there might be a disconnect if a new feature were added to SELECT, etc, or even if no new feature, perhaps not all the clauses and current special-to-VFP features would work (UDFs come to mind!).
For another... if this behavior were ever changed, I'd want it changed for SELECT-SQL, wouldn't you? Not just for cursoradapter <s>.
Later,
>L<
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only