>>I think you're refering to 'copyright for authors'. But as you know this right has some counterparts, like 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of the press'. Those rights enable us to publish (parts of) texts. Of course, if the author goes to court, then the 'publisher' must come with a plausible justification for the act of publishing.
>
>
>Yes, this is about copyright. The counterpart is called "fair use" and it's what allows me to quote a paragraph from a book, as long as I cite it. I think the question of what's fair use from something the length of a letter or email is a good one.
[snip]
Well, I'm talking about other counterparts, like 'freedom of the press'. If the 'publisher' thinks there's a plausible justification for the act of publishing, then the publisher may even decide to publish the whole thing.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
