Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hi Mike,
>Wow! I didn't know that! One more reason to use m., eh?
m. is not a optional on VFP:
1. for not ambiguous programming
2. for performance
( try to use a variable without m. and with 200 fields on the current workarea )
I donnot put m. only when use table with holes on fields list, the hole is filled by the variable with the default value.
Fabio
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only