>>>Bravo! At my agency I see VB/SQL or PB/Sybase C/S solutions forced onto small to medium size projects, and it's just plain overkill. It's just not efficient for most of the situations here to use C/S, but upper management wants to be "en vogue"...
>>
>>One way to handle this is to build VFP app and tell management that this is really C/S :). This is why UT gets questions how to hide Fox head on some dialogs.
>
>That's exactly what we've done. In our charter for the current application, it lists at the start "Client/Server system," though we're using vfp. No managers know enough about vfp to contradict it. :)

In my company VFP is considered as C/S :). You see my signature "C/S Specialist", this is official job title.