If JVP had a site - I'd loggin

But - why is such a talented competing so hard just to have his point of view declared the absolute point of all views?

Arguments are not something to win. Arguments are sex! They serve to mutate an idea to it's next incarnation (whatever that is).

I'm manic/depressive. I take advantage of it, but I don't nurture or foster it. It almost seems as if JVP's mind is feeding off his introspection. Or something like that! Hopefully, the current cycle will peak - and we can get a few good months of production out of the guy before the next one begins!


>For posterity, JVP's message footer (in case he changes it later)
>
>***********
>wikis.com - An intellectually dishonest environment because the owner chooses to censor certain differing points of view for personal reasons - under the guise of "refactoring". Instead of addressing the issues, he chooses to instead - delete wholesale posts and further, to block IP addresses. The only logical reason is that certain points of view cannot be addressed by the forum owner - so censorship in the tradition of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao is the only remedy the owner sees fit to employ. Clearly, there must be a grain of truth/validity to the deleted points of view. The censorship activity contradicts the "protocol" as set forth in http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~WikiProtocol. Indeed, the wiki owner violates a core value of what his wiki is supposedly based upon. You cannot get much more intellectually dishonest or hypocritical than that.
>***********
>
>Allegations without proof. Can JVP spell "libel"? Add a soupcon of hyperbole, shake well...
>
>One can only wonder why JVP doesn't start up his own Wiki if he doesn't like Steven Black's. Of course, his "intellectually honest" Wiki would welcome any and all input from Mr. Black.
>
>For some reason, I don't think I'll hold my breath...