>Here's the e-mail to steve and his reply to me.
>
>Nuff said ?
>
>What more proof do you need... Steve did it no question.
>
>Rodman
>
>I edited that topic myself this morning.
>
>**--** Steve
>
>
>Saturday, November 22, 2003, 11:47:09 AM, you wrote:
>RP> Someone hozed up
>RP> that topic again. All of your latestest comments are gone. Any
>RP> chance you can restore it.
>
>RP>  
>
>RP> Rodman
>
>RP>

??? So posts were deleted. At no point did I say they weren't. You're trying to use that act as proof of "unethical" behaviour by Steven Black.

Do you expect me to believe he deleted those posts for no valid reason? Why are you and JVP so reluctant to show them, or even discuss their general tone? Are they something JVP is not likely to be proud of?

Steven Black can't defend himself on this forum, so speaking strictly for myself I'm holding you to a high standard of proof before I believe JVP's allegations. So far, I'm not convinced JVP is blameless in this matter.

My comments, right from the start, have been about JVP's handling of this issue - specifically the message footer he briefly used here on the UT. Neither you, nor he, have chosen to address these comments, and you've had plenty of opportunity. Do I conclude you have nothing to say?