Al,
There was no requirement whatsoever to include "proof" as you call it. First, I knew that Steve had admitted to doing it to Rod in an email - but that was not my call to bring that up. That was Rod's call - and he did that. Second, more than a few people did see what I wrote - and did notice that it was gone. In fact, Steve was noted as being the last editor of the topic when my stuff disappeared.
Al - you asked for proof - and you got it. Your "timing" requirement is completely beside the point.
>
As a real simple exercise, could you please point out to me any proof you provided in your message footer (in the first post I made to this thread)?
>
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only