In a scenario such as you have described one of two conditions may exist:

1. Acronyms are invented first and the words made to fit.
2. Acronyms are created after the fact.

Governments and the military love acronyms.

If that fails then use terms like, “Operation Iron Fist”. A new term should be used frequently to indicate a failed plan and give a sense of confidence to the sheep (believers).


>>And what's the next step? Forbidding the use of the number 69?
>
>Next step in which direction?
>
>I figure the next step, once the pressure against the exaggerated PC newspeak builds up enough, there will be a swing in the opposite direction, so beans will be called beans again, and peas will be called peas.
>
>Still, it is only a symptom. Whenever I saw language manipulated, there was a manipulator with an agenda completely outside of the linguistic area. The language is just a tool. And the whole PC speech is just an excuse for not really doing the right things. It gives polite names to real problems, and serves just as a pretext for not doing a thing about them.