><snip>
>
>>Terry,
>>Typically, the control source for the grid (or listbox) would be a cursor.
>>So, I would have to loop through the cursor and add the rows to the listbox, correct? That could introduce a delay in the object appearing with data, correct?
>>The idea of sorting without indexing is definately attractive.
>
>Hi Allan
>
>It's been my experience that I often have to grab columns from multiple tables for the user to sort on. That is not necessarily easy without using SQL.
>
>You should compare using SQL to create a cursor, and then populating the listview, versus indexing the cursor and binding a grid to that cursor. I'd guess a few index commands will be faster than the looping code that populates the listview.

Mike,
Tks for the tip.
I will have to try the listview with some different business scenarios.