>>>If you could, cite to the thread and message...that would help.
>
>Is this another one of those "if you disagree with me you have to prove it but I don't" scenarios?

Well John...

I do not recall me making the general statement you are accusing me of making. I remember a lot of debate - most noteably with you - regarding the merits of RV's. As I recall, you took much of what I said personally (as is often the case with many in the Fox Community). You know...just because I attack the merits of a particular implementation, that does not mean I am attacking you personally for making that implementation a choice. As a developer, you have to make your own calls. As long as you are delivering value for your clients - good for you. But - just because you get something to work - that by itself - is not a proof that makes the implementation a best choice.

As far as your comment above is concerned - it is not a matter of me disagreeing with you. You made an assertion about something I said. I simply asked you to point to the thread/message here on the UT were I said that. If you can't do that, fine - then just say that. But please, don't try to reframe the issue as a disagreement as opposed to an allegation. You should know by now that I would never let you get away with that. As somebody who claims to be schooled in the art of debate and logic - you know that is a big no no. That is the classic strawman - and you know (or at least you should know) you can't slide that smack by me...

Hey...maybe I'll see you in Vegas. At some point, the day will come where we will get to meet in person!!