Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
It would be nice to have some constructive VFPvs.Net pos
Message
From
22/12/2003 10:54:13
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
 
 
To
22/12/2003 10:22:23
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Visual FoxPro and .NET
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00861269
Message ID:
00861290
Views:
41
Perhaps we should start by setting up a list of features expected from any programming language. Off the top of my head, here are a few features that might be interesting to compare amongst VFP, .NET, Delphi, Java, etc.

How easy is it to:
  • Create forms
  • Create reports
  • Create menus
  • ...

    Where is OOP included:
  • In forms
  • In menus
  • For data access

    How well is OOP implemented in general?

    Is OOP easy to implement?

    Execution speed:
  • Data access
  • Tight loops
  • ...

    Cross-platform:
  • What platforms are supported?
  • How easy is it to change from one platform to another (do you have to recompile, do lots of conditional coding, etc.)?

    IDE features:
  • Code syntax
  • Intelligence (like the Intellisense in VFP)

    Compilation:
  • Are most errors caught in the compilation phase? Strict typing helps here.

    Development time:
  • How long does it take, in general, to develop a business system?
  • A graphics-intensive application?
  • Any other category you may want to code for.

    etc.


    >Hi all
    >
    >I know this is a real long shot, but over the last few months discussions seem to be getting extremely tense when it comes to comparing VFP to .Net, a lot of heated arguments tend to erupt from what some people seem to take very personally.
    >
    >I, myself, would love to have, to hand, some realistic differences between VFP & .Net and where the main strengths/weaknesses lie. I know it's been done before (successfuly? I don't know) and there is probably tons of material out there on this (or is there?) but I feel people need to be informed of why they are chosing a product they are chosing, NOT BASED on arguments generated in this forum, but rather decent laid out differences.
    >
    >I know you probably think I'm a fool and possibly tempting fate here but I would be very interested, without it getting nasty :-), to hear advice from experts from both sides, and it not to be a result of a stupid argument. I also understand Mr McNeish's book also covers this, but only on an introductory level, IMO.
    >
    >If anyone thinks it's a bad idea, let me know and I won't kick-start the discussion, otherwise I'll attempt to get things rolling.
    >
    >Thanks
    >Kev
    Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
  • Previous
    Next
    Reply
    Map
    View

    Click here to load this message in the networking platform