>> There will always be "gotchas" in a product as complex as VFP. [...]
>> I just change my code and move on, it's just not likely that something so
>> base in the VFP code will change before I can "fix" the "problem" in my code.
>
>Yes, I think that's what we all do - find the problem, work around it, add a note to the 'don't do this' list, and move on.
>
>However, I also think you'll agree that Fox - while being supremely powerful - is also one hell of a prissy prima donna at times. And I think it is worth it to stoke the fire under Ken Levy's butt a little because not all glitches are really necessary, no? ;-)

Necessary? No, I don't think many of the glitches would fall into that category. I'd love to see them all disappear, but even then, I'm sure they'd just be replaced with something else that didn't work as expected.