>
Hehehe you make it look like everybody can do whatever they want with MS. It did'nt look that way when their was an investigation by the U.S.A. government about monopoly abuse charges.
>

Are you trying to draw a corollary between what MS can/cannot do and US Antitrust law as codified by the Sherman Antitrust Act? If so - I would like to hear you articulate that...

The fact is Denis - what MS does or does not do with VFP has nothing to do with Antitrust Law. There is nothing anti-competitive in MS's actions here.

I'll leave it at that...


>
I'm surprised a lot by your reply. Isn't this the first time you replied to defend MS anti-vfp strategy? ROFL
>

This is where the pathetic view point comes in. I don't see the anti-VFP strategy here from MS....