Gary

>>I have briefly scanned these messages and until I see documented proof I won't be persuaded
>
>Now where have I heard that sort of comment before?

I don't see any harm in wanting to see some hard-facts, after all, not everyone has used a tool for "every" type of application and situation.

>>I'm going to start with my own tests and when someone points out something I've missed, I'll be happy to acknowledge it.
>
>There you go again.

I still don't see the problem, I'm one of these people who doesn't just take people's word for it, I would "like" to see it in the flesh - do you belive in ghosts?? Seen any?

>>and until you can fully appreciate where .Net is coming from, most people won't get it.
>
>Hark at you. I assume you do "get it"?

I didn't at first, no, but if this wasn't the case then why are we still seeing people trying to decide between Fox and .Net?

>
>>Still talking about Rick again? ... as I like to see things in concrete form first.
>
>Jeez Kevin, you've really changed your tune. I can remember some of your posts from a year or two ago when you were getting pretty hot under the collar because the council weren't taking VFP seriously and you might just have to learn a new language .

Actually, it wasn't the fact that the language was changing, it was the "lack" of reasoning behind it, someone came in with absolutely "ZERO" knowledge of Fox and made assumptions that it was cr*p, that was what p*****d me off.

Kev