Jim,

I was paraphrasing your comment, "WHY VFP's FUTURE DEMISE IS SO IMPORTANT TO YOURSELVES!" Putting this statement in all caps meant to me that you thought some folks wished the demise would happen quickly, i.e. tomorrow.

PF

>Perry,
>>Jim,
>>
>>I think you are twisting the argument around. I've never, ever seen comments from anyone that they wish VFP would die tomorrow.
>>
>It's clear to me by the tone of your reply that you have little regard for my reply. Or maybe you just didn't read it...
>
>Can you show me where I said, in my reply, that I feel that someone (anyone) wishes "that VFP would die tomorrow"?
>
>I must have missed it, Perry. Or is it possible that the "twisting" is actually happening elsewhere?
>
>And a Happy New Year to you regardless
>
>
>SNIP