Ok, I'll add my finding. But one more question then. Don't you think that there should be at least some 'moderator' who checks the correctness of the updates of at least 'your' page? By this time the text has become kind of an official instruction, at least to some. I'm an example of someone who tends to use that text as the 'official' list of rules.
>Hi Peter
>
>It is my understanding that the wiki pages are supposed to be updated by all without consideration of ownership. I started it and several people have contributed to it. I don't consider it mine. Please feel free to update it with new findings.
>
>>Esparta, thanks for your tips. I'll wait a bit longer for Mike's answer. Somehow I regard Mike as the 'owner' and moderator.
>>
><snip>
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
