Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
How to migrate VFP prog to C/S ?
Message
From
23/03/1998 17:55:29
 
 
To
23/03/1998 17:39:13
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Classes - VCX
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00085402
Message ID:
00086567
Views:
24
Robin,

Here's something which ought to generate some contraversy - I think a case can easily be made that FRAGMENTATION IS GOOD in a true multitasking environment!

I have never worked with NT Server, but I do believe that it is a true multitasking system. That being the case, and assuming that multitasking *IS* actually going on, then large files which are fragmented means that there is less "other" data to traverse to get at the data of interest. This should add up to be relevant pretty quickly.
In fact I think MS ought to give us a way to "control" fragmentation better, just for such circumstances, as well as give us a "FRAGMENT" command where we could have some control over fragmentation of specific files and volumes.

All this, as stated up front, for multitasking only.

Cheers,
Jim N

>>We have a VFP application running on NT LAN. Sometimes it's slow, especially while working with big tables.
>>How large are changes necessary for migration to C/S technology with
>>SQL-server ?
>>TIA
>If you mean that you have the VFP files on a shared folder ( directory) on an NT server, you might consider optimizing your NT server environment. Specifically, the biggest hit could be: Fragmentation of NTFS partitions. There are several programs available from non-MS sources that address this fragmentation problem: Symantec's Norton Utilities, and Executive Software's Diskkeeper. We use Diskkeeper -- latest version will even defragment NT directories! Other considerations, include what else you are running on the NT server itself -- are you treating it like another workstation and just a repository for your VFP data as well, you may not be happy with the attention that NT pays to its own local keyboard and display. Several of our sites have upgraded the LAN hardware from 10 base T to 100 base T with some, but not staggering performance improvement. I can't take the time or space to indicate all the reasons you may not be satisfied with the performance you are experiencing on
>NT, but without even knowing what you are trying to do the forementioned steps have helped us.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform