>>Hmmm, I can't imagine the CursorRefresh doing both a REQUERY and TABLEUPDATE. I would look in the BeforeCursorRefresh method to see if the TABLEUPDATE is done there.
>
>When I added new record to the cursor (INSERT INTO cursor_name...) and then called CursorRefresh. It updated the table by adding new record to the table. Is this wrong and should some other method be used instead of?

You are doing this correctly. i just can't believe the CursorRefresh is performing a TableUpdate as well. Are you using table or row buffering? My guess would be row buffering where something is moving the record pointer off the added record so an implicit TableUpdate is firing. ANyway, you should either do a TableRevert() or TableUpdate() before calling the CursorRefresh. I am quite sure something else is going on because CursorRefresh does not natively do the TableUpdate for you. Something else is triggering this.