>>But from a puer technical standpoint you are correct, of course ;-)
>
>"Puer" \Pu"er\, n. [Etymol. uncertain.]
> * Latin - boy.
> * English - The dung of dogs, used as an alkaline steep in tanning.
>
>Is this standpoint that of a boy, or just a load of crap? ;-)

As my fingers are *never* really purring over the keyboard,
and any puerile attempts at latin are nearly forgotten,
logic dictates it should be the last.

;-)