Only YOU could take 6 time the words to reply to a very simple post.

For your information your response to which I originally replied (prompting yours below) left the distinct impression to any reader that you already had replied by the time the original writer made his statement 'to which you have not replied...'. In other words you were effectively saying 'I did, you a**sole' and that was entirely incorrect and an impression that I felt deserved correction.

Man, you do like to hear yourself talk!

And, for the record, 99% of people here interpret < s > as a SIMLE, and when a "sigh" is the expression then 99% of the people here use < sigh >.

Jim


>>
>I think
>>
>
>Debateable...
>
>>>
>what you really meant to say here was more like 'thanks, I had missed it and have now responded.'.
>>>
>
>No...what I meant was that I responded. If I missed the post - I would have said that. Word choice in my case is not a by-chance thing.
>
>I did not "miss it". I did finally get around to posting my response. When a post requires and deserves a thoughtful response (unlike yours, Gerry's, JR, et al.) - I take my time in reading the post (his had some length). When I was ready, I formulated my response.
>
>Jim, your post adds no value - and yet you will likely be the first to cast a stone to say my posts do not add value.
>
>Take a page from your own book and think about your post before hitting the send button...
>
>But if you must post - you are free to do so...