>>
>>I understand what you're saying, and I guess you have a point - but tradermark the way their name SOUNDS? Don't you think that's kinda pushing it beyond what's necessary?
>
>That's the way it works. You take any variation of your trademark and try to enforce it. The Lindows thing comes to mind.

Hmmmmm...well I guess that makes sense. I'm suprised that they lost to Lindows - I mean that seems more or a tradermark infringment that anything else I've seen for a while..... oooooh well.