Cetin

>I think Kevin picked this ".Net is bad at data" from one of my posts ? If so please add 'performance' to understand.

The "bad at data" was in John's original post that I responded to, I didn't pick it out from your post.

>"
>>However, ADO.Net is (and I have tested to some degree) slower than Fox in processing local "data", it isn't that much slower mind, certainly not enough to sway decisions as to which language to use.
>>>
>>
>>Right..if it is slower, it is to an irrelevant degree."
>
>I think you got the point in fact. It IS slower and not to an irrelevant degree.
>
>Kevin already created another thread for a comparison on it and never took time to respond :(

I know, I'm trying to juggle work and performance testing and haven't had time to get back to everyone, sorry.

Kev