>>>>>
>>>>>I understand what you're saying, and I guess you have a point - but tradermark the way their name SOUNDS? Don't you think that's kinda pushing it beyond what's necessary?
>>>>
>>>>That's the way it works. You take any variation of your trademark and try to enforce it. The Lindows thing comes to mind.
>>>
>>>Hmmmmm...well I guess that makes sense. I'm suprised that they lost to Lindows - I mean that seems more or a tradermark infringment that anything else I've seen for a while..... oooooh well.
>>
>>As an anonymous writer said ten years ago: "Beware of the man called doors who sells windows".
>
>hehehehehe...an update...
>
http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html?tag=nefd_topThey're not taking just their trademark too seriously... they are taking their own self too seriously. Which is not healthy.
