>Martin,
>
>>I guess it would be the other way around: you may expect see more DML extensions in upcoming .Net languages. And maybe many other VFP features would slowly get into .NET and Visual Studio.
>
>I agree completely. And let's not forget the fact that Longhorn OS has very interesting integration of what seems to be SQL Server beneath the covers, managing the metadata for the file system, folders and files and enabling the cool dynamic filtering of folder/file displays.
>
>I would not be at all surprised to see even more "local data" capability built into Longhorn and future OS versions, as well as in Visual Studio .NET and the .NET Framework, perhaps building on the VFP cursor technology. I just realistically don't expect to ever see a VFP.NET product (I'd love to be surprised).

If local-data enhancements were to be extended more often in .Net, there wouldn't be a need for a VFP.Net - you would practically already have it.

Kev