>John: Isn't Jet somehow involved, technically, with SQL Server?? As in part of the engine? Just a question.

No. SQL Server and Jet are different.

>I think what was meant by this comment was that if it works and works well in Fox, why move it???

Agreed. Moving something for the sake of moving something is stupid.

>I'm liking this 3-tier architecture you've espoused before more and more :)

Cool