>True, but you tended to agree with him.

Nope. I responded to your somewhat over-zealous response to him.

>OK, whatever ... this will sound childish, but you started it when you called me flippant. <g>

Yes, it does sound childish. I didn't call you flippant, I think I mentioned that your response was flippant.

>Yes he does. And I have the right to gripe about banning being a form of censorship.

This is a pro-Fox board, not a centre for the freedom of speech. Your concerns about "censorship" are, frankly speaking, somewhat of an over-reaction. JVP is quite a problem who just stirs most people up the wrong way. I suspect Michel regrets the day he ever let JVP back here.

>Less risk from what?

You have an acknowleged competence in a new and exciting language that most VFP developers have not. As a result, I believe that you are at much less risk in your career than many Fox developers are currently. I think that is a somewhat easy point to grasp.

>My only comment was to complain about censorship.

Whatever.