>I just want to add the observations of one very stubborn person as regards this issue (of TAG on DELETED() being good or not)...
>
>I SURELY AGREE that today a TAG on DELETED() is most likely a BAD IDEA.

I think there is a big difference between simply having a TAG on DELETED(), vs a TAG on DELETED ** FOR DELETED() **; ie. the former indexes ALL records, while the latter only indexes "deleted" records.

I use DELETED() tags all over the place, since I do record recycling, and haven't really noticed any problems ...