>>>>>That's more than 2000 dollars for EACH U.S. citizen; babies, children, old-aged included! So, that's what the U.S. will gonna spend coming year per person WITHOUT HAVING COLLECTED THAT AMOUNT AS TAXES. And who'll gonna pay this back to the ones who lend that money? Your U.S. children?
>>>>>
>>>>>I thought the U.S. was the richest country in the world! Well, perhaps it was... once.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry - what does that sum represent? I must have missed the corresponding piece of news.
>>>
>>>That's the shortfall in President Bush's budget submission to Congress today.
>>>And I should add... it's still gotta be rich for people to lend them money like that!
>>
>>Jim, what do you mean with your last sentence? Please, rephrase. :)
>
>All that I mean, Peter, is that NO money is lent to the poor, particularly at 'reasonable' interest rates. So because they will be getting this money the lenders consider them rich enough, it would seem.
If you're rich, why lend money???
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
