Jim, that sounds good, but, I don't see Ken Levy pursuing this angle with VFP. What it sounds like is that his other group is developing a vfp clone to work natively with .NET and target the users you're talking about. I wish MS would push VFP to this group, but, I won't start being optimistic about that until I here or see something otherwise...
>Hi Claude,
>
>>SNIP... Unfortunately, this sort of product doesn't generate as much revenue as VB+Access.OR.NET+SQL+ all the other tie-ins that the other products generate. Therefore, IMO, MS does not market it out of fear it will eat into the other areas.
>SNIP
>
>An interesting and oft-repeated hypothesis for sure, but one that could end up back-firing badly on MS!
>
>By MS' own yardstick they set the "small/medium business market" at 8,000+ employee companies.
>Now I think we all agree that this number leaves PLENTY of businesses that fall somewhere between 1 - 7,999 employees. That is, plenty for products like VFP (an all-purpose product).
>
>MS is marketing the hell out of .NET and SQL Server and wilfully neglecting VFP, marketing-wise. BUT THE TWO MARKETS ARE DIFFERENT, even by MS' own admission.
>In other words eating into their target market is a silly notion - NO amount of VFP marketing will even dent the massive dollars spent advertising .NET.
>
>In the meantime, though, there is the constant growth of Linux. What market is most likely to adopt Linux in the nearer term?... I'd have to guess the 1-7,999 employee market is THE logical one.
>So MS runs far more of a risk, in my opinion, neglecting this market or force-feeding .NET down the throats of people whose decisions are funded directly from their own pocketbooks. When more and more people in this market choose Linux MS will loose far more than it can ever imagine.
>
>cheers