>>...do you think VFP as a % of all development tools, comprises more than 1% of the market?
>
>Probably not. There are probably more COBOL programs running around than there are VFP ones - but that doesn't mean COBOL is newer/more advanced that VFP either.
>
>>Fox likely does not account for anything close to 1% of MS's revenue.
>
>
Most likey also true, but I don't think it makes up 1% of their product line either.
>

Good...there is no argument then... If you generally agree with my stated premise, then there is not much to disagree about.

Also, thanks for the spelling tip...