Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Politics in the US.
Message
 
To
10/02/2004 15:18:03
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00872370
Message ID:
00876024
Views:
19
>I say we pay for everything with 'funny money.' :o)

My goal is to print my own money and to only print what I need. I do not wish to be greedy! :)


>
>>>And who pays for it? :O)
>>
>>Let me see! The present administration has increased the National Debt by a large amount and it grows daily. Personally, I cannot see any good that has been done to improve the United States by increasing the National Debt. Our infrastructure continues to decline as one example.
>>
>>Fear not our funny money (National Debt) is being put to a good use! It costs money to run a war but we are “rebuilding Iraq”. Too bad we cannot do something noticeable for ourselves like filling a few potholes on our roads and hi-ways!
>>
>>Helping our nation or our people is not a topic that is very popular. We have a guiding light in Washington D.C. that has determined the destiny of our nation and the world. This will work until we run out of ink to print our funny money!
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>SNIP
>>>>>>I like to look at Political Liberals and Conservatives in my own way. The Liberals are Jeffersonians and the Conservatives are the Crown. The Liberals are willing to create and accept change while the Conservatives are not. To suggest or create change is treasonous to the Conservative.
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>>Change is a fact of life and eventually those that refuse to accept it will be left behind. I could accept the liberal position much easier if 'change' did not encompass more taxes and a socialist government! :o) That is in fact the direct opposite of the Jeffersonians. (I'm afraid the 'liberals' are getting a bad rap these days) *G*
>>>>
>>>>Interesting point Tracy! If as I have expressed the Conservatives are like Plato’s Apologia, which is “you owe everything to the state”, then you must take the opposite viewpoint “the state owes you everything”! Perhaps that is indeed what one must state as the Liberal agenda. I do believe in helping those in need but then you have the problem of “who needs help, how much, for how long and at what cost”? :)
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform