>>>>How is Whil's behavoir irresponsible?
>>>
>>>The fox is my living and not only mine. Thinking of that he should have chosen his words with more care.
>>
>>Which words that Whil wrote were irresponsible?
I think you may have missed this question.
>Hi Chris,
>
>I was referring to my
initial message #
878550.
>If Whil does (1) not give names and (2) does not say that it's about
some people only and (3) does not give the exact examples, then it's an accusation in the wild towards us/me/some/whoknows. I have no indication that he was referring to me, but I also don't have an indication that he wasn't. Moreover, I take a stance for others, more than for myself.
I think that's a bit odd. When someone posts a message such as the one Whil posted, I usually don't think that they are referring to me. What makes you think Whil may have been referring to you? I reread his message, and saw nothing in there that points to anyone specfically. If I had to guess, and it's only a guess, my guess is that he is in part referring to Steven Black's posts on the Fox Wiki:
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~SuggestionsForTheHentzenwerkeWebsiteHave you and Whil exchanged e-mails or posts that I am not aware of?
I also do not understand your statement that you are taking a stand for other, more than for yourself. If you are not sure who Whil is referring to, then how can you defend them?
Chris McCandless
Red Sky Software