>Hi all,
>
>Sort of off-topic here. There is an article in Pinnacle's Hardcore VS.Net re: What's new in ASP.Net Whidbey?, that discusses Precompilation stating that: Traditional ASP.Net pages... I just attended one of MS Webcast this week about ASP.Net something and the speaker noted something about Traditional ASP... Its Friday and I was just wondering what is scoped when you refer to something as traditional even though its not really gotten mainstream yet.

I don't use ASP.Net but here's what I think about that reference about something traditional.

This could be seen as a gimmick. I don't target ASP.Net here but those using worthless terms about something. It could be a way to make a person believe that he is not as hot as he thought he was. So that person could try to get on faster to learn that new thing before it's too late because if it's traditional then it must mean that already many others already use it. Then this way there are chances that those promoting that "faked" traditional tool could interest more people than just saying "our very new almost not used so far" tool.