Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Not in statement
Message
De
03/03/2004 10:13:31
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivie
 
 
À
03/03/2004 09:55:04
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00882687
Message ID:
00882699
Vues:
18
>The below works:
>
>
>SELECT cn_name, cn_port, cn_printer FROM lcontrol ;
>  WHERE !EMPTY(lcontrol.cn_name) .and. lcontrol.cn_name IN ;
>  (SELECT ctrlname FROM ctrlset WHERE ctrlset.printform = .T.);
>  INTO TABLE (hdir+"tTEMPLCONTROL.DBF")
>
>
>so does the reverse:
>
>
>SELECT cn_name, cn_port, cn_printer FROM lcontrol ;
>  WHERE !EMPTY(lcontrol.cn_name) .and. lcontrol.cn_name IN ;
>  (SELECT ctrlname FROM ctrlset WHERE ctrlset.printform = .F.);
>  INTO TABLE (hdir+"tTEMPLCONTROL.DBF")
>
>
>However, the reverse of the first using NOT does not work, any idea why anyone?
>
>
>SELECT cn_name, cn_port, cn_printer FROM lcontrol ;
>  WHERE !EMPTY(lcontrol.cn_name) .and. lcontrol.cn_name NOT IN ;
>  (SELECT ctrlname FROM ctrlset WHERE ctrlset.printform = .T.);
>  INTO TABLE (hdir+"tTEMPLCONTROL.DBF")
>
>
>The 2nd two statements should produce the same results, but they do not. What is wrong with the "not in" portion?

It seems to me they should produce different results. You can have different subsets of data for .T. and .F.; IN and NOT IN would work on the corresponding subsets, which may, or may not, be related. I suggest you experiment on paper, with some sample data, to see whether you get the same results or not.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform