I'm get'n a brain cramp....



>Hi Terry,
>
>I think you are correct. Einstein mathmatical formula to express time (e.g. the function of the speed needed to travers a distances or space) must have been defined at the speed of light, with nothing that could exceed the speed of light over any distance, even a infinite emptyness of space.
>
>Of course if I were moving in the same direction as time, and at the speed of light, as defined in such a equation, my relative position to time would remain unchanged, which would indicate that time would not exist at the speed of light. It seem to me that the formula is flawed.
>
>Time or change occurs everywhere and in every direction. Greater change would occur from objects moving at faster speeds, but I would continue to age based on some measure of speed, such as the time required for the earth to make one complete revolution around the sun, which is one year. Of course I could travel a much greater distance during one year, if I were moving at the speed of light, as opposed to 60 miles an hour.
>
>Space which is an emptyness, or void, is the canvus upon which time occurs.
>
>Currently we have no way do draw a boundry or parameter around space, so we could say within this boundary is space, and on the other side of the boundary is something else. We have to look at the canvus, or emptyness of space, as infinite, and certainly, time is occuring everywhere within the infinite space, whether we can preceive it or not.
>
>Regards,
>
>LelandJ