Simple to fix: from now on all articles can only mention the features and advances in technology but not the manufacturer at all. That would make it much more interesting when you attempt to research it more or to actually find it and purchase it later! :o) *G*

>It doesn't.
>
>It is just that this was one with a bit of 'history' that I was aware of and from an author whose motives I have questioned before, so felt there was possibly more substance by which to make the suggestion.
>
>I'd like to see ALL advertisements disguised as news banned from the UT Main Page. Period.
>
>Jim
>
>>While you might have a point, what makes it different than, say, the article titled "Upgrades make Linux so easy to use", which is obviously a big advertisement in favor of LINUX?
>>
>>>I don't think that the article "Technical comparison of MySQL.... vs. SQL Server 2000" is at all worthy of a spot as "news" on the UT main page!
>>>
>>>It is one big advertisement in favour of MS SQL Server disguised as an "article".
>>>
>>>I find it disappointing that such an "article" can make it to the UT Main page and urge its removal asap.
>>>
>>>Jim