SNIP
>
>This would not affect my code as well, but for new development it will mean less typing. They could implement this as a SYS() setting or a Set DefaultDialog ON|OFF so it wouldn't break existing code.

They could even implement it so that if it is in a TRY section of code then it would report the problem rather than emitting the dialog. That way no one's OLD code breaks EVER as a result of the improvement.
>
>
>>I've taken the responsibility to deliver a product that works as I intend. If I use this "feature" who's at fault if it doesn't work the way I want, me or the Fox team?
>
>
>Again, i am 100% in agreement with you, my code works because i know of this feature and coded around it. But it would be nice to have an option to turn it off.
>
By the logic expressed above your comment, Stephane, we should NEVER be requesting enhamcements that make a programmer's life easier OR lets him/her deal more effectively with the end-user. Seems the product must be pretty much perfect as it is!!! We should probably go through the UT Wish list and delete a whole bunch of items. Also, it seems that VFP7 and VFP8 must have been a huge waste of time for the VFP Team because in those released they did deliver lots of wish list items.

Jim

>What wrong do you see in this request ? Other that you don't care about it.