Hi John,

Good to know someone at Microsoft has looked at this tread, do you think of it as a possible ER in VFP9 ?


>This is a EULA violation. I would stongly advise you not to take that route.
>
>>
>>I hope you are able to find a resolution to your problem.
>>
>>
>>I find a solution.
>>I need to do a VFP C++ reverse engineering, and crack my runtime VFP8*.dll.
>>
>>But this is one unacceptable effort in order to correct this behaviour.
>>
>>I want VFP9 resolve it.
>>
>>If VFP9 not resolve it, i change the VFP9*.dll code.
>>
>>Fabio