Hi Thomas,

I am totally aware of how to do this myself, I just wanted to help Chad to get the result of the functions/procedures, which he does not get with your approach, as far as I can see?

>Tore,
>
>in theory you are correct, but if you have legacy code where
>oodles of functions are given the same name you better tread
>VERY carefully. I've encountered this in a large FPW app -
>if you want to be nice you can call it an early attempt in
>template programming...
>
>Usually I'ld just move the proc's into a proc
>library if I'ld need the return value, but even that won't work
>if there is a function with the same name defined in the program file
>of the current proc.
>
>Then it is safer to call the specifc proc IN Special.app,
>and if you need the return value this is IMHO best done with
>the wrapper I described in my other posting.
>
>Sometimes even the "best" resolve is as ugly as the other code...
>
>my 0.02 EUR
>
>thomas