Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Problems with Outlook in XP/Outlook 2003
Message
 
To
24/03/2004 03:46:35
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
COM/DCOM and OLE Automation
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00888961
Message ID:
00889210
Views:
15
Thanks again for your replies.

regards,

Gerard


>Hi Gerard,
>
>In theory it is possible to turn the security warnings off, but I tried it over a looong period and gave up. I have heard many programmers with the same experience. Also consider that IF you are able to turn it off, it will be a per machine routine. By that I mean that you must either change the settings on every machine, or if you use Exchange, you must change the settings for each user. As I wrote in my first message, Outlook Redemption is by far your best choice. I have used it for years, works perfectly.
>
>>Hi Michael. Thanks for your reply.
>>
>>I am a bit relauctant to get another piece of softeare to replace outlook as all the APP has been written, and tested, for Outlook.
>>
>>Is there no Options settings within Outlook to turn this 'Security' feature off or disbale it ?
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Gerard
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Hi, Some of our users installed new XP pcs with Outlook 2003 recently.
>>>>Since then each time they wish to send an email (Controlled by a VFP app which automates outlook), it comes up with a whole series of qusetions asking to confirm ,in addition to some delays.
>>>>
>>>>I understand that this is some sort of anti-spam initiative by Microsoft, but is there a way of turning this off ??
>>>>
>>>>Rgeards,
>>>>
>>>>Gerard
>>>
>>>It looks like no-one has bothered updating Outlook to the latest service pack on the older machines (for quite a few years, I might add)... Service packs from about 1.5 to 2 years ago and later have integrated this 'security feature' into Outlook.
>>>
>>>As Tore suggested, Redemption is a possible solution - but depending upon your environment you may want to start sending messages from your application via SMTP instead. It's much less prone to Microsoft's whims...
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform