David,

My comment was not meant personally to anyone, so if you take offence, I am very sorry. I had no special person in mind, and my comments were not only a reaction to answer to my messages, but also answers to other people, like Fabio. And if you haven't read any comments that this hopefully new feature is not wanted by someone, I ask you to reread the messages. There are plenty of comments about why this would not be a good idea, which in my opinion is exactly the same thing.

By the way, unless something new comes up, this matter is closed as far as I am concerned.

>Tore,
>
>It's a real shame that you don't see this as the simple difference of opinion that it is.
>
>I believe that everyone that has posted in this thread can in fact see both sides of the issue. I don't remember seeing any posts that said that this option should not be added to VFP. There has been a lot of discussion saying that this change would not be very useful to some because their current code design prevents the open dialog from occuring.
>
>Someone does not have to agree with your position to qualify as either smart or wise.
>
>>Regarding the 'wise' guys, one of my favourite expressions is that you may be wise without being smart, and you may be smart without being wise. Wise people often misses the ability to see a problem from more than one side.