>>You said it was not supported presently; you gave no reason why.
>
>I don't have to.

See, that's why many people think you are arrogant. Then in the section below you tell me it's already on the list. What a pain it is to discuss things with you sometimes.

>
>>So, after going through all this do you now see that it might be something useful. Is there something more formal than this thread that you need to consider it for implementation?
>
>That is already in our list since a while. It will be done when I'll be able to make it fit.