>>Was there a final outcome?
>
>As David Byrne said - Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was......
>
>This can't be my development tool...
>It can't be so that it does not support OOP....
>Because the VB pundits said it has inheritance and OO...
>Damn - I have been lead astray...
>My god - what have I done ???
>
>They all believe it is OO. They all believe it has inheritance. They all believe that it supports OOP.
>
>BTW, did you ever see the one post made about VFP and the VFP community:
>
>Those Fox folks are the *most* bizzare group I've ever had the pleasure to
>observe. I have *never*, and I mean never, seen a group so paranoid and defensive. Not even the most anal Delphites can compare. You see, Fox died years ago, but there's still a few 100 folks trying to convince the world otherwise. By pumping OOP out their spleen, they now feel they have something by which they can prop VFP up against the tool that ultimately will kill them all. Bunch of (very sore) losers, for the most part.
>
>
>The funny thing is - when VB gets OOP - it is going to be us that will ultimately enlightem them all.
>
>Just biding time....
>
>Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was......
>
>
>< JVP >

nah -- they'll just move to access.