> CursorAdapter does not change the value for the property and this is designed behavior.

Hi Aleksey, and thank you for your reply.

I cannot understand how this can be by design. First of all, if one does not change this property, then if you delete from a cursor that is based on a select from two related tables, rows are deleted in both when you call tableupdate(), even though the tables property only contains the name of one of the tables. Furthermore, this behavior is different when using native tables - deleting then works as expected and respects the tables property.

Secondly, if you try to set the property ("Unique table") in the cursorFill method, it is reset to the empty string when this method is completed. Is that by design as well?

Best regards,

Eyvind.