Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Devteach - (Getting into Canada)
Message
From
07/05/2004 13:14:52
 
 
To
07/05/2004 10:33:18
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00897012
Message ID:
00901980
Views:
21
>>Hi David. Nicely written.

Thanks

>Using WINNING as a metaphor for the results of the processes involved in politics, religion, war, or economy demands the suspension or alteration of what most people know WINNING to mean.

>>Perhaps I should have written winning as "Winning" - capital "W" to distinguish it from the petty winning that we are normally involved in :)

Jos, I actually know what you mean....and I don't mean to be petty with this. The notion that people can take action in a unified direction rather than opposing directions results in "Dancing" (ok, that's MY preferred word...)
But the result is COOPERATION rather than COMPETITION.

>Of the 16 definitions in my dictionary, all have to do with acquiring something, and most have to do with acquiring something at the expense of someone or something else.

>>But one can Win and one can win. When we win someone else loses. When we Win we can all Win. But the politicians and their greedy biznez people dont get it. Only politicians and the media think wars are won. The rest know that one side just loses less.

I agree, and I like the phrase "loses less"...it says so much.....

>Winning is, by MOST definitions, the EXCLUSION of the larger portion of a given population. The notion of "Win - Win" is a phallacy [ :-) ] of logic invented by a business-oriented world to pacify a consuming public. It is as oxymoronic as the term "Honest Politician".

>>Yes and no. We can choose to make win-win an empty cliche or not. Its a choice.

Agreed.... Most business people I've talked with have a very loud and positive sounding definition of win-win that looks good on paper until you start examining the details. Then it inevitably comes out that their definition includes a healthy bias in their favor....at the expense of the "other" parties involved.

>Any situation established as a GAME, (economies, stock markets, politics, war) will have, BY CONVENTIONAL DEFINITION, a WINNER and a LOOSER.

>>Only if one plays finite games. There are also infinite games where all parties can win. But thats another thread :)

Do go on!!! What are Infinite Games??? Sounds rather Olympian! :-)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform