Fabio,
I guess you´re right. This indeed would make it simpler. However I´m not sure on how many VFP developers are waiting for this feature and if the VFPT should implement this.
IOW, I don´t think many developers would regard your problem with the non-optimizable GO BOTTOM as such a big problem that it should be addressed in the next version at the cost of some other equally time consuming feature request.
By no means I´m saying that you´re wrong. In fact you do have a valid point up here. The only question is if it is important enough to make it for VFP.Next
Walter,
>
>I agree that might be usefull in some cases.
>>
>With this, the TAGNO zero is the natural RECNO() order,
>and your code he becomes very simpler for every situation:
>
>* optimized GO BOTTOM
>IF DESCENDING()
> SET ORDER TO TAGNO() ASC
> LOCATE
> SET ORDER TO TAGNO() DESC
>ELSE
> SET ORDER TO TAGNO() DESC
> LOCATE
> SET ORDER TO TAGNO() ASC
>ENDIF
>