Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
NYT Reporter in Brazil
Message
From
14/05/2004 13:36:05
 
 
To
14/05/2004 13:02:44
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00903219
Message ID:
00904142
Views:
24
While your approach is definitely the safest way to go, I think that it really is, as has been expressed here, more of a 'local' phenonema. Especially as regards 'touching' a policeman!
The U.S. in PARTICULAR seems to accept this attitude by a policeman (that he's OK to shoot first and ask questions later). Maybe it's because concealed weapons can be carried by anyone. I don't know.
But I can tell you that I have tapped a cop on the shoulder, here in Toronto, and all he did was to turn around, look at me, and say 'yes sir. How can I help you".
I also know that I would never tap a U.S. cop on the shoulder, simply because all that I have seen look more like a weapons mart on legs rather than a person out there to help and protect me!

cheers


>I think the smart person, in any society, never touches anyone who carries a weapon and knows how to use it. That is just common sense... why would you need to touch him/her anyway? To many people (let alone those that are accustomed to being verbally and physically attacked by those they serve) touching is an invasion of private space.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform