Hi Mike,

This is from the article:

========================================
With no hard evidence of relativist in either the magnitude of supernovas or in light-curves of quasars, a new hypothesis is justified. The exponential polynomial function 1/e^ (ax + ab) provides a better curse fit than relativist expansion to the magnitude/distance function of SNe la.
========================================

Einstein introduced the idea of time dilations in his theory of special relativity, a kind of fudge factor, to cope with a maximum speed in the universe of C.

Here are a couple to definitions of time dilations:

==========================================

The slowing of time in a frame of reference moving at nearly the speed of light relative to an observer, predicted by the theory of special relativity.

==========================================
When one accelerates towards the speed of light, time slows down with respect to the rest of the Universe. That is, a stationary observer would see the traveling objects slowing down their activity (while still traveling fast). For them, time passes slower.

It is important to note that this effect is extremely small at ordinary speeds, and can be safely ignored for all ordinary situations. It is only when an object approaches speeds on the order of 30,000 km/s (still 1/10 of the speed of light), that it becomes important.

===============================================

Einstein fudge faction (e.g. time dilation) built into his mathematical equation do not produce much of a result under ordinary circumstances, but it can yield strange result over huge, huge, huge distances or speed approaching C. Maybe a correction to Einstein's equations are in order to eliminate the effect of time dilation which is currently likely causing exaggerations in estimating the distance and size of far away galaxies.

This would eliminate the problem of the universe being altered based on the speed one is traveling, as nothing that I know can alter the universe. It would also make the universe flat, as opposed to space being curved.

The article is very interesting, an maybe a small correction to Einstein's equations regarding special relativity is in order.

If I'm way off regarding what I got out of the article, let me know; because, the subject matter was very complex for this "KISS" kind of guy. <g>


Regards,

LelandJ